The Letters of Junius (1769–1772) showcases the anonymous writer’s fearless, razor-sharp attacks on Prime Minister Duke of Grafton, Lord North, Lord Mansfield, and even implicitly King George III—letters that terrified the government while galvanizing public opinion in late-18th-century Britain. At their core is a powerful defense of constitutional liberty: the free press is the “palladium of all your rights,” acting as a moral mirror that forces officials to choose between duty and reputation through relentless scrutiny. Junius warned that liberty dies by inches through “minute encroachments”—small precedents that seem harmless at first but harden into doctrine, enabled by long parliaments (the Septennial Act) that reduced accountability and fostered Crown influence, patronage, and corruption. He fiercely defended the jury’s right to general verdicts in libel cases against Mansfield’s doctrine, which sought to limit juries to mere facts and reserve criminality judgments for Crown-appointed judges. Specific scandals exposed include selling public offices to settle political debts, politically motivated pardons overriding jury verdicts, and the House of Commons voiding voters’ repeated election of John Wilkes in Middlesex to install a government favorite. His final letter directly challenged the king: if the people must defend their God-given rights, on whom could the Crown rely? The letters also circulated widely in the American colonies, where their bold defense of free press, constitutional vigilance, and resistance to arbitrary power resonated with patriots and helped shape the radical Whig ideology that underpinned the American Revolution—this urgent call for citizen vigilance, courage, and active resistance still resonates powerfully today.
The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America
The Myth of the Robber Barons dismantles the long-held narrative that America’s Gilded Age titans like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, and Carnegie were ruthless villains exploiting workers and crushing competition. Historian Burton Folsom distinguishes between “market entrepreneurs,” who innovated to lower prices and create value (e.g., Vanderbilt slashing steamship fares by 90% through efficiency), and “political entrepreneurs,” who relied on government subsidies and failed spectacularly (e.g., Collins’ subsidized lines collapsing). Market giants like James J. Hill built superior railroads without handouts, outlasting wasteful, corrupt subsidized rivals, while Carnegie and Rockefeller revolutionized steel and oil by focusing on quality and cost-cutting. Folsom argues true capitalism thrives on voluntary cooperation and consumer service, not cronyism, where political favors breed inefficiency and higher costs for all. This distinction reveals how the “robber baron” label smears innovators while ignoring real parasites using state power. The book warns that today’s crony capitalism echoes those failures, urging a return to free-market principles for genuine progress. Provocative and eye-opening, it challenges: in an era of bailouts and regulations, are we rewarding true creators or just modern political entrepreneurs?



